Could you… a whole car?

 

Let’s suppose for a mad moment that you could print a structure by depositing layers of material at nano-scale. Say we’re in the year 2040. The material is deposited by something like an inkjet print head but the inks, instead of having CMYK etc colours, are formulations of raw materials. According to Bill O’Neill, a leading researcher in nano-scale fabrication at Cambridge, if the particles of material in the ‘ink’ are small enough, molecular forces will cause them to bond together into continuous structure, without the need for applied energy. Okay, let’s say you want to print a car. You could print all the parts and then assemble them with screws, fasteners and adhesives; you could print ready-assembled sub-assemblies (power plant, seats, suspension units, electronic packages and so on) — or you could just print the whole car in one lump. Let’s try that, one lump, in layers from the ground up.

 

The printing machine will have to be pretty big of course. With a car-size-plus build envelope and space for mechanical transport systems, materials tanks, electronics and the rest, it’s probably about the size of a small two-story house. Maybe three stories. So in this machine, an exotic print head is scanning back and forth, progressively moving along the length of the build-space depositing materials, and some kind of support medium we should suppose, layer by layer. And these are thin layers; let’s say each one is only one micron thick, so there are 10,000 layers per cm! There’s already a big problem here, with resolution, because for simpler structures and their materials — a suspension arm for example — it’s most likely too high; for a bearing surface it’s barely acceptable; and for an electronic chip — it’s several orders of magnitude too course. But we’ll ignore this for a while, and proceed anyway (I want to discuss the resolution issue in more detail in a later post).

 

Of course the resolution in the X direction — the length of the vehicle — will need to be about the same as in the Z.  Now, let’s be ambitious and assume the head’s speed and acceleration in traversing the Y axis is about the same as the fastest current generation high-resolution photo-printer — head speed about 250cm/sec — and that the head lays down a strip of dots 2cm wide (that’s 20,000 dots). So the number of material dots printed per second is 20,000*250*10,000 — about 50 billion. Oh well.

 

If the car is the same size as a 2010 Toyota Prius (X=446cm Y=174.5cm Z=149cm), and if the head takes an ambitious 1sec to traverse a typical Y (including acceleration and deceleration) and with 223 2cm strips in the X, one layer will take 223sec to build. Multiply that by 1,490,000 layers and you get a build time of about 10years!

 

So that’s not going to work then, not the way I just described it anyway. And even if it did, it’s hard to imagine a satisfactory product with parts so relatively roughly hewn. Anyway, putting all that to one side, what would be a sensible build-time for an all-in-one additive car? In truth, probably no more than an acceptable wait for a factory order car today — say eight to twelve weeks — so consumers can take advantage of the inherent mass-customisation capabilities of the new technology. So they can have not only the colours, trim and accessories choices a new Mini may offer, but also variations in shape and mechanical detail, perhaps. So if we were to aim for a delivery wait of ten weeks, we’d have to speed up the manufacturing build by a factor of about 50.

 

This mind experiment raises many questions about the scope and capabilities of additive manufacture, many of which I plan to tackle here in the coming weeks. Maybe it’s daft to even consider making a whole car in one go — my own view is that it’s simply a matter of time.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

41 Responses to “Could you… a whole car?”

  1. Julian Vincent says:

    You are forgetting the great advantage of a biological education – the realisation that parallel processing is possible. An insect, which builds itself even more slowly in terms of accretion rate, has many cells which are all laying down material at the same time. Why can’t you have several hundred printing heads which don’t actually move very much ()thus saving quite a bit of energy straight off!), each of which (or each group of which) is responsible for one set of components. That means you can vary material and resolution according to the required product, and everything takes place quite locally. That will also make it easier to alter the design or materials.

  2. Tom says:

    I believe it’s all possible! Cars, aeroplanes, the lot!
    Parallel processing just cannot work for this as a principal though. Working in XYZ is tricky on this scale as it is but the multiples required to produce a car in the same time as it is currently made are simply not possible!
    I do though think you may be missing an important factor: materials. I agree that the timescales for layered fabrication with current materials is not feasible for high resolution, multiple material, large components however, this technology relies on current materials. Let’s say for a moment that deposition of materials is not the way to go because we are not limited to building in alloys, metals, plastics and other polymers and perhaps we were not limited to heat as a means to form these materials? The issue then becomes a more back to basics question of how to get the right material to the right place, in the right quantities and how do I keep it or fix it there? I have my own ideas on how this can work but I’d be interested to hear your alternative ideas to deposition of materials.

  3. Geoff Hollington says:

    Thanks Tom, good comment. Materials are, as you say, a key here. Biology employs a fairly limited set of basic materials to make all the plants and animals on the planet. It can make hard, strong, flexible, elastic and transparent materials, often with remarkably high performance — sometimes at levels we simply cannot match in our own materials technology. According to my biomimetics mentor Julian Vincent this is because biology makes complex, hierarchically structured composite materials. In a nano-additive manufacturing world we could do something similar, fabricating ‘metamaterials’ — where behaviour comes from material properties combined with micro- or nano-structural geometry. I want to turn to a meta-materials discussion soon.

  4. Geoff Hollington says:

    Julian thank you, but at least I know one — a biologist that is. You are absolutely right, in fact (and I would say this wouldn’t I?) I was planning to look at multiple heads as a strategy for speed; but your rationale is undoubtedly more eloquent. But goodness, the data flow would be phenomenal — if each one of my 1micron heads addresses 50 billion dots, a one-nanometre head of the same size but for printing electronics and ultra-smooth glass-like surfaces (windows, lights etc) would cover 50 trillion! And you’re talking about several hundred print heads. The control computing would need to be massively parallel, and calculate most of the data algorithmically, on the fly. In your model the print heads would possibly be mounted on arms rather than scanning bridges — a nice image. I plan to visit the whole subject of resolution shortly, then maybe re-assess the car-printer, using a multi-head model, to see how the required ten-week lead time could be achieved.

  5. Frankie says:

    How are you?! Please e-mail me your contacts. I have a question james@infansport.ru” rel=”nofollow”>……

    Best regards….

  6. ROBERT says:

    PillSpot.org. Canadian Health&Care.Special Internet Prices.No prescription online pharmacy.PillSpot.org. Vitamins@buy.online” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    Categories: Stomach.Weight Loss.Antidiabetic.Anxiety/Sleep Aid.Blood Pressure/Heart.Antiviral.Stop SmokingVitamins/Herbal Supplements.Mental HealthAntibiotics.Pain Relief.Skin Care.Womens Health.Mens Health.Antidepressants.Eye Care.Anti-allergic/A…

  7. TONY says:


    CheapTabletsOnline.Com. Canadian Health&Care.No prescription online pharmacy.Special Internet Prices.Best quality drugs. Online Pharmacy. Buy drugs online

    Buy:Nexium.Prevacid.Arimidex.Human Growth Hormone.Valtrex.Zovirax.Retin-A.Actos.Prednisolone.Lumigan.100% Pure Okinawan Coral Calcium.Zyban.Mega Hoodia.Synthroid.Accutane.Petcam (Metacam) Oral Suspension….

  8. ISAAC says:


    NEW FASHION store. Original designers collection at low prices!!! 20 % TO 70 % OFF. END OF SEASON SALE!!!

    BUY FASHION. TOP BRANDS: GUCCI, DOLCE&GABBANA, BURBERRY, DIESEL, ICEBERG, ROBERTO CAVALLI, EMPORIO ARMANI, VERSACE…

  9. CLINTON says:

    ████████►BUY LEVITRA◀███████…

    ▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲…

  10. DAVE says:

    Accutane@official.site” rel=”nofollow”>.

    Buywithout prescription…

  11. JIMMIE says:

    Actos@official.site” rel=”nofollow”>..

    Buywithout prescription…

  12. JOSHUA says:

    Aldactone@official.site” rel=”nofollow”>.

    Buygeneric drugs…

  13. DARRELL says:

    altace@medication.now” rel=”nofollow”>…

    Buygeneric meds…

  14. CARLTON says:

    abilify@vs.risperidone.dosage” rel=”nofollow”>.

    Buygeneric drugs…

  15. JULIAN says:

    abilify@anxiety.now” rel=”nofollow”>.

    Buygeneric drugs…

  16. JEREMY says:

    generic@Levitra.now” rel=”nofollow”>..

    Buyno prescription…

  17. KIRK says:

    buy@viagra.in.london.england” rel=”nofollow”>…

    Buygeneric drugs…

  18. JAVIER says:

    Zyrtec@official.site” rel=”nofollow”>…

    Buyno prescription…

  19. DARRYL says:

    depakote@parkinsonism.now” rel=”nofollow”>.

    Buyit now…

  20. SHAWN says:

    Clindamycin

    Buywithout prescription…

  21. REX says:

    Zoloft

    Buygeneric drugs…

  22. MAURICE says:

    asperger zoloft 100

    Buydrugs without prescription…

  23. SHAWN says:

    Xalatan

    Buywithout prescription…

  24. DAVE says:

    Zyrtec

    Buyno prescription…

  25. ADAM says:

    Zyrtec

    Buygeneric meds…

  26. JEREMIAH says:

    Pyridium

    Buygeneric drugs…

  27. DONNIE says:

    purim wiki

    Buydrugs without prescription…

  28. JEFF says:

    Prozac

    Buynow it…

Leave a Reply

*